Twitter
RSS

The Top 10 Wind Farms in Turkey in 2009 in Terms of Capacity Factor

0

For there is not any other source in the internet listing the top 10 wind farms in Turkey in 2009 in terms of capacity factor, I think this blog entry is going to engage your attention.

Before listing top 10 wind farms, I would like to give a brief information about capacity factor.

Capacity factor of a wind farm can be defined as the ratio of electricity generated in a certain time to electricity generated at continuous full-power operation during the same time.

For example, Catalca RES Wind Farm (http://www.sankoenerji.com/eng/index.html#/fields of operation/wind farm) consists of twenty units of Vestas V90 3 MW wind turbines with total capacity of 60 MW. This wind farm generated 150834 Megawatt-hours of electricity in 2009. So, the capacity factor of Catalca RES Wind Farm can be calculated as:

150834 MWh / (60 MW * 8760 h)= %28,7

After this brief information, lets take a look at the top 10 wind farms in Turkey in 2009 in terms of capacity factor:


As it can be seen from the list, Bilgin Enerji Yatirim Holding A.S's Bandirma Wind Energy Power Plant (BARES) leads the way with a capacity factor of 41,96%. BARES consists of 20 units of GE 1,5MW wind turbines. You can find detailed information about this WPP in http://www.bilgin.com.tr/eng-bandirma.htm .

BARES is followed by Keltepe RES with a capacity factor of 38% and Bores with a capacity factor of 35,6%. 

The other wind farms that are achieved to hold a place in this list are Yuntdag RES, Mare RES, Camseki RES, Alize Enerji RES, Karakurt RES, Akbuk RES and Catalca RES.

Note 1) Downtime is neglected while calculating capacity factors. Capacity factors are calculated by taking yearly production on basis of 365 days.
        2) Barres, Keltepe, Bores, Yuntdag, Mare-Res, Camseki, Alize, Karakurt, Akbuk, Catalca, Tepe, Datca, Burgaz, Duzova, Ayyildiz, Sayalar, Sebenoba, Samli, Mazi, Bandirma, Lodos, Ares, Belen, Sarikaya, Bahce and Soma wind power plants' production rates are taken into consideration while preparing this ranking.

A.Yigit NEPHAN
22.07.2010






Notes from WWEA's World Wind Energy Report 2009

0
I had taken some notes while reading World Wind Energy Report 2009 which was published by World Wind Energy Assiciation. Now, I would like to share these notes with you:

- Growth rate of wind energy industry in terms of installed capacity was 31,7 % which can be stated as the highest rate since 2001.

- China was the pioneer country in terms of adding 13800 MW capacity within one year.

- The USA was the number one in terms of total installed capacity followed by China and Germany.

- Asia had  40,4%, North America had 28,4% and Europe had 27,3% shares of new installations.

- Investments in wind energy gained momentum in spite of the global economic crisis. So, the crises had no negative impact in the development of wind energy industry.

- The finance sector had learned that the investment in wind energy is a low-risk investment.

- The highest growth rate was seen in Mexico (~400%), followed by Turkey (132%) which had the highest rate in previous year, China (113%) and Morocco (104%).

- 340 Terawatthours was produced with all wind turbines installed by the end of 2009. This amount can supply 2% of the global electricity demand or the electricity demand of Italy which had the seventh largest economy of the world.

- Continental shares in new installed capacity was as follows in 2009: Asia 40,4%, North America 28,4%, Europe 27,3%, Latin America 1,9%, Australia Pacific 1,4%, Africa 0,4%.

- Continental shares in total installed capacity was as follows: Europe 47,9%, Asia 25,1%, North America 24,2%, Australia Pacific 1,5%, Latin America 0,9%, Africa 0,5%.


Reference:
-  World Wind Energy Report 2009 ( http://www.wwindea.org/home/images/stories/worldwindenergyreport2009_s.pdf ). Report. World Wind Energy Association. February 2010. Retrieved 22 March 2010.


A.Yigit NEPHAN
13.07.2010

Path Dependency and Wind Energy Industry Part III: Siemens Wind Power A/S

0

In second section of my article, I had given brief information about  Enercon GmbH ( http://www.windonline.org/2010/07/path-dependency-and-wind-energy.html ) in terms of path dependency and factors directly effecting it.

Here in third part, you will be able to find evaluation of Siemens Wind Power A/S in terms of path dependency and factors directly effecting it.

Siemens Wind Power A/S


Siemens was established on 12 October 1847 in Germany. Inventor of telegraph, Werner von Siemens named his company as Telegraphen-Bauanstalt von Siemens & Halske.
As it can be seen in Table 1.1, Siemens' managerial intentionality to expand in global arena resulted in acquisiton of many companies or mergers, especially beginning from 2000.

Until 1970, although there was not any merger or acquisition, Siemens expanded its business in many different areas by using its financial power as an extension of resource advantage theory. During World War II, Siemens had good relationship with the regime in Germany and benefited from this situation economically (Url-1).

Just after the war, Siemens diversified its business by feeding from its economic power which was relatively constructed by the help of the regime in Germany. So, actor-network theory shaped Siemens’ decision in a path creating way. Not only its economic power, but also demand from the market shaped its decision.

Table 1.1: Siemens’ Acquisition and Merger










































The main subject that is going to be discussed is Siemens Wind Power A/S. Siemens acquired Bonus Energy in 2004 to enter wind energy business. For it is totally new business area for Siemens, this decision can be considered as a path creating one. Siemens entered market by acquiring Bonus Energy to derive benefit from its resource, knowledge and experience advantage. Bonus Energy was the first manufacturer who built offshore wind turbines in 1990s. So, Siemens focused their developments on offshore wind turbines and became market leader in terms of installed capacity. It seems that Siemens is going to continue to focus on offshore wind turbine development and try to keep its leadership as a result of actor-network theory and managerial intentionality. Siemens Wind Power A/S’s vision is to be best at wind industry. Here below, you can find Energy Farming International’s World Market Forecast of Wind Industry in terms of MW installed per annum. According to this estimation Siemens is going to increase its position in offshore wind market which can be achieved by path dependent decisions sourcing from know-how and experience gained in industry and which are free-from behavioural and technological lock-in. On the other hand, another information that can be clearly seen from this table is that wind energy industry will continue to grow.

Table 1.2: Energy Farming International’s World Market Forecast of the Offshore Wind Industry December 2008

Summary of historical development of Siemens Wind Power A/S can be found below in Table 1.3.

Table 1.3: Siemens and Factors Effecting Path Dependency





To sum up, there are a lot of path creating decisions realized within Siemens Wind Power A/S in micro scale. In macro scale, it can be considered that Siemens Wind Power A/S contiuned that the tradition inherited from Bonus Energy on a path dependent way. If we look at the picture from Siemens Group’s perspective, it can be surely stated that a path creating actions are adopted for company branched into many different business areas in macro scale.




Abbreviations

ANT               : Actor Network Theory
BL                  : Bootlegging
LI                    : Lock-in
MI                   : Managerial Intentionality
MIS                : Micro Scale
MAS               : Macro Scale
OL                  : Organizational Learning
PD                  : Path Dependent
PC                  : Path Creating
RAT               : Resource Advantage Theory



References

Prager, L. D., 2007: Poop Culture: How America Is Shaped by Its Grossest National Product. Feral House, Los Angelas, CA.

Raghu, G., and Karnoa P., 2001: Path Dependence and Creation. In Path Dependence and Creation. Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, London, UK.

Wilsford, D., 1994: Path Dependency. Journal of Public Policy. Vol.14, No.3, pp.251-83

Callon, M., 1998: Introduction. The Laws of the Market, London, Blackwells.

Barnes, W., Gartland, M.,, Stack M., 2004: Old Habits Die Hard: Path Dependency and Bevioral Lock-in. Journal of Economic Issues. Vol.14, No.2, pp.371

Knight, K. E., 1967: A Deep Descriptive Model of the Intra-Firm Innovation Process. The Journal of Business. , Vol.40, pp.478-496

Rycroft, R., Kash, D., 2002: Path Dependence in the Innovation of Complex Technologies, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol.14, no.1

Url-1 , http://www.energy.siemens.com/hq/en/power-generation/renewables/wind-power/wind-turbines/ accessed at 17.01.2010.

Stack, M., and Gartland, M. P., 2003: Path Creation Path Dependency and Alternative Theories of the Firm. Journal of Economic Issues. Vol.  XXXVII, no.2, pp.487.

Dickson, P. D., 2003: Toward a General Theory of Competetive Rationality. Journal of Marketing. Vol.56, pp.75

 Hunt, S. D., and Morgan, R. M., 1996: The Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition: Dynamics, path dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions. Journal of Marketing. Vol. 60, pp.107

Greener, I., 2002: Theorising Path-Dependency: How Does History Come To Matter in Organizations. Management Decision. Vol.40, pp.616

Hutzschenreuter, T., Pedersen, T., Volberda, H. W., 2007: The Role of Path Dependency and Managerial Intentionality: A Perspective on International Business Research. Journal of International Business Studies. Vol.38, pp.1058

Augsdorfer, P., 2005: Bootlegging and Path Dependency. Science Direct Research Policy, pp.1-9. Retrieved February 2010  from http://www.sciencedirect.com


A.Yigit NEPHAN
07.07.2010




Path Dependency and Wind Energy Industry Part II: Enercon GmbH

0

In first section of my article, I had given a brief information about path dependency ( http://www.windonline.org/2010/06/path-dependency-and-wind-energy.html ) and Vestas Wind Systems A/S in terms of path dependency and factors directly effecting it.

Here in second part, you will be able to find evaluation of Enercon GmbH in terms of path dependency and factors directly effecting it.

Enercon GmbH
Enercon was founded by Aloys Wobben in 1984. Its established as a wind turbine manufacturer company. Their first product was Enercon E-15/16, 55 kW wind turbine. Enercon sold its first ten wind turbines in 1986. When Enercon was established, it did not have its own production facility. They only had a design of wind turbine and outsourced production in those days. If there was not any subcontractors to manufacture these turbines then Enercon wouldn’t have a chance to manufacture its own product. So it existence has a close relationship with actor-network theory. After having required financial background, managerial intentionality was going to shape future of the company. The important point about Enercon is that everything started with wind energy business for company. There was not any business area that company have operations in.


After two years, Enercon established own production facility in 1988 after gaining required background. It is considered to be path creating decision for company sourcing from managerial intentionality. It was also about to make company have resource advantage not only in knowledge and experience terms but also in means of manufacturing their own designs. Just after this period, Enercon developed E-17 / 80 kW and E-32 / 300 kW wind turbines. By the help of organizational learning which is shaped by knowledge and experience gained from E-15/16 wind turbines, helped the development of this product (Url-1).

In 1991, Enercon developed the prototype of gearless wind turbines. This development could be considered as a path creating development for Enercon was the first company having considerable amount of  market share that manufactured gearless wind turbines, although in terms of wind turbines manufacturing, it can be considered as a path dependent decision.

In 1993, Enercon started serial production of E-40 / 500 kW wind turbines. They also started construction of a plant to produce their own rotor blade. Investments on wind energy business gained momentum for Enercon because actors in the market is inclined to maintain their interest to company products.

In 1995, Enercon started serial production of gearless E-30 / 230 kW in India. It is first time that they started to produce wind turbine components on a continent other than Europe. Managerial intention to internalization was to key to this decision which can be considered as a path creating one. They also tested a prototype wind turbine which is E-66 / 1500 kW on company site in Aurich. So meanwhile, knowledge and experience through organizational learning continued to shape company’s future.

In 1996, Enercon purchased a production facility in Brazil. As the demand from market grew, managerial intention was to expand which resulted in path creating decisions in terms of entering new markets.

In 1997, Enercon installed a wind powered desalination plant in Tenerife in Germany. This development can be considered as a path creating decision for the wind turbine manufacturer for it is the first time it focused on another business area. On the other hand, for it is a wind powered desalination, it could also be considered that the company was still walking on the path that it started its journey on.

Enercon invested on another manufacturer company to produce E-66 / 1500 kW wind turbines in Magdeburg in Germany in 1998. By using its resource advantage, Enercon continued its investments in wind energy business.

In 2001, Enercon built foundations and towers for E-112 / 4,500 kW wind turbine prototypes and established a production facility in Magdeburg-Rothensee.  Its total production area reached up to 285,000 m2.

Enercon established rotor blades manufacturing facility in Turkey in 2002 and erected the first E-112 / 4,500 kW prototype in Magdeburg-Rothense. Enercon came on to an agreement with Demirer Holding in those days. The main idea of the frame agreement between both companies was to work together on Demirer Holding’s wind farm projects in Turkey. So, Turkish actor played an important role in terms of making Enercon open a facility in Turkey to reduce its production cost. So, actor in the network was considered to shape Enercon’s decision which was a path creating one. By the advantage of know-how gained in establishing facilities and Turkish investor’s market awareness, Enercon realized this path creating decision.

A rotor blade manufacturing facility for it also built in Magdeburg-Rothense in 2003.

In 2004, Enercon sold its first E 70 / 2 MW wind turbine with new rotor design. Also two wind farm of E-112 were constructed near Emden in Germany. Enercon also installed first near shore E-112 wind turbine in this year. This development can be considered as a path creating development because onshore and near shore wind turbine technologies have some certain differences.

In 2005, a concrete tower facility opened in Emden. It can considered as distinct path creating decision for the tower production prices was considerably decreased and complexity level of production phase of towers decreased. After this progress, worldwide production area was expanded to 370,000 m2. 6 MW Enercon E-112 wind turbine was developed. A prototype of E-82 was erected near Aurich in Germany. So, Enercon continued to realize path dependent decisions sourcing from knowledge, experience gained from wind energy business.

Enercon built a new headquarter in Aurich in 2006. Not only they further developed E-112 and E-126 wind turbines but they also built prototypes of E-44 and E-53 within this year.

New production facility was opened in Portugal in 2007. One year after development, first prototype of E-112 6 MW prototype was installed.

In 2009, they started production at new factory in Gusszentrum Ostfriesland. They had completed and commissioned a hydro power plant in Raguhn in Germany and expanded facilities in Magdeburg. Construction of hydro power plant can be considered as a path creating decision for another business area was chosen for investment.

Summary of historical development of Enercon GmbH can be found below in Table 1.1.

Table 1.1: Enercon and Factors Effecting Path Dependency










To sum up, Enercon continued on the path, that it started in wind energy business. Although it invested on hydro power and desalination plant, its main focus was always wind energy business. Although these investments can be considered as a path creating decisions, path dependent decisions shaped the future of Enercon beginning from its establishment up to now in general means in macro scale. It can be also indicated that technological lock-in was not a matter of subject in any phase of company’s existence.



Abbreviations

ANT               : Actor Network Theory
BL                  : Bootlegging
LI                    : Lock-in
MI                   : Managerial Intentionality
MIS                : Micro Scale
MAS               : Macro Scale
OL                  : Organizational Learning
PD                  : Path Dependent
PC                  : Path Creating
RAT               : Resource Advantage Theory



References

Prager, L. D., 2007: Poop Culture: How America Is Shaped by Its Grossest National Product. Feral House, Los Angelas, CA.

Raghu, G., and Karnoa P., 2001: Path Dependence and Creation. In Path Dependence and Creation. Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, London, UK.

Wilsford, D., 1994: Path Dependency. Journal of Public Policy. Vol.14, No.3, pp.251-83

Callon, M., 1998: Introduction. The Laws of the Market, London, Blackwells.

Barnes, W., Gartland, M.,, Stack M., 2004: Old Habits Die Hard: Path Dependency and Bevioral Lock-in. Journal of Economic Issues. Vol.14, No.2, pp.371

Knight, K. E., 1967: A Deep Descriptive Model of the Intra-Firm Innovation Process. The Journal of Business. , Vol.40, pp.478-496

Rycroft, R., Kash, D., 2002: Path Dependence in the Innovation of Complex Technologies, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol.14, no.1

Url-1 , accessed at 12.01.2010.

Stack, M., and Gartland, M. P., 2003: Path Creation Path Dependency and Alternative Theories of the Firm. Journal of Economic Issues. Vol.  XXXVII, no.2, pp.487.

Dickson, P. D., 2003: Toward a General Theory of Competetive Rationality. Journal of Marketing. Vol.56, pp.75

 Hunt, S. D., and Morgan, R. M., 1996: The Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition: Dynamics, path dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions. Journal of Marketing. Vol. 60, pp.107

Greener, I., 2002: Theorising Path-Dependency: How Does History Come To Matter in Organizations. Management Decision. Vol.40, pp.616

Hutzschenreuter, T., Pedersen, T., Volberda, H. W., 2007: The Role of Path Dependency and Managerial Intentionality: A Perspective on International Business Research. Journal of International Business Studies. Vol.38, pp.1058

Augsdorfer, P., 2005: Bootlegging and Path Dependency. Science Direct Research Policy, pp.1-9. Retrieved February 2010  from http://www.sciencedirect.com


A.Yigit NEPHAN
03.07.2010